news Canadian News
Good Evening Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Canada's Supreme Court gives mixed rulings on g

Canadian Content
2720news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Canada's Supreme Court gives mixed rulings on gun crime penalties


Law & Order | 27192 hits | Jan 27 8:22 am | Posted by: DrCaleb
5 Comment

Canada's Supreme Court found one mandatory minimum sentence for a firearm offence unconstitutional and upheld two others in a pair of decisions published on Friday.

Comments

  1. by avatar DrCaleb
    Fri Jan 27, 2023 5:31 pm
    I think that makes it a clean sweep for the Harper Government.

  2. by avatar Strutz
    Fri Jan 27, 2023 8:47 pm
    In the above article they mention a case of armed robbery with a prohibited weapon. So if a prison sentence is unconstitutional then it's ok to use a weapon in a robbery as long as you don't actually shoot and kill anyone? If the minimum is too much then how long is ok? A couple of years? A few days? (/sarcasm)


    I just read this article on CTV, similar to the above link.

    Mandatory minimum penalty for firing gun at house unconstitutional: Supreme Court

    The decision comes in the case of Jesse Dallas Hills, who pleaded guilty to four charges stemming from a May 2014 incident in Lethbridge, Alta., in which he swung a baseball bat and shot at a car with a rifle, smashed the window of a vehicle and fired rounds into a family home.

    Hills argued the minimum four-year sentence in effect at the time for recklessly discharging a firearm into a house or other building violated the constitutional prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.

    Perhaps I'm not seeing this clearly but wouldn't discharging a firearm at a home, presumably where there are people inside, be an attempt to harm those inside? Like attempted murder? If so, why would a sentence in prison be cruel and unusual punishment? Do people have to actually die for a crime to be committed? This messaging seems to indicate it's peachy keen to fire a weapon into a home as long as no one gets hurt?

  3. by avatar DrCaleb
    Fri Jan 27, 2023 10:37 pm
    "Strutz" said

    The decision comes in the case of Jesse Dallas Hills, who pleaded guilty to four charges stemming from a May 2014 incident in Lethbridge, Alta., in which he swung a baseball bat and shot at a car with a rifle, smashed the window of a vehicle and fired rounds into a family home.

    Hills argued the minimum four-year sentence in effect at the time for recklessly discharging a firearm into a house or other building violated the constitutional prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.

    Perhaps I'm not seeing this clearly but wouldn't discharging a firearm at a home, presumably where there are people inside, be an attempt to harm those inside? Like attempted murder? If so, why would a sentence in prison be cruel and unusual punishment? Do people have to actually die for a crime to be committed? This messaging seems to indicate it's peachy keen to fire a weapon into a home as long as no one gets hurt?


    The cruelty part comes in because there is a minimum sentence involved for any crime including the use of a gun. If you steal a gun, it's the same mandatory minimum if you were to use a gun to rob a store. It removes the discretion of the Judge to weigh circumstances into the sentence. So, like you say, the punishment is the same if there was no one home, and if there was a house full of people. That doesn't fit with the 'fairness' guarantee of a trial in the Constitution.

    Or, so goes the defendants argument. The court agreed. Mandatory minimum sentences are unfair, and unconstitutional.

  4. by JaredMilne
    Sat Jan 28, 2023 12:37 am
    To me, this is the height of the dumbfuckery:



    In allowing Hills�s appeal, the Supreme Court said the mandatory minimum sentence was grossly disproportionate, given that a young person might fire a paintball gun at a house as part of a game.

    �The mandatory minimum cannot be justified by deterrence and denunciation alone, and the punishment shows a complete disregard for sentencing norms,� Justice Sheilah Martin wrote on behalf of a majority of the court.

    �The mandatory prison term would have significant deleterious effects on a youthful offender and it would shock the conscience of Canadians to learn that an offender can receive four years of imprisonment for firing a paintball gun at a home.�





    You seriously mean to tell me that the legal system can't differentiate between a paintball gun and a lethal firearm when deciding which crimes to charge somebody with? That it can't tell the difference between mischief and vandalism (shooting with a paintball gun) and reckless endangerment (shooting a genuine firearm)?

    Or am I putting too much faith in peoples' common sense?

  5. by avatar raydan
    Sat Jan 28, 2023 12:44 am
    I choose to believe that your last sentence was sarcasm. :wink:



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • Strutz Fri Jan 27, 2023 1:20 pm
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net