|
Author |
Topic Options
|
Posts: 33691
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 11:32 am
Unsound Unsound: Haha, Catholics my friend.
Really ? Never had that problem with Catholic girls I knew. Guess I got the really bad ones. 
|
Posts: 42160
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 11:51 am
At the font gargling holy water? 
|
Posts: 33691
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 12:14 pm
ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog: At the font gargling holy water?  You're supposed to do something else with it ? 
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 1:24 pm
sandorski sandorski: Your whole argument seems to centre around the word "Coach". You have attempted to draw one conclusion based upon that word based upon 2 unrelated usages. I find it quite perplexing that anyone could make such an argument and expect anyone else to draw the same conclusion you are drawing.
So again, giving you the opportunity to redeem yourself, are you a troll or easily triggered? You're taking a small bit from a large multi-faceted, well supported argument and doing what prog trolls do when revealed as idiots by such complexity. You're calling troll. You're so ridiculous, you're almost humorous.
|
Posts: 42160
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 1:35 pm
martin14 martin14: ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog: At the font gargling holy water?  You're supposed to do something else with it ?  I've got family history with the OL and RBI....so there are a few other uses for it. 
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 1:37 pm
fifeboy fifeboy: $1: Can you show me where, in the curriculum, it says that children "should plan on sexual activity that is by statute illegal." $1: “How would thinking about your personal limits and making a personal plan influence decisions you may choose to make about sexual activity?” Well, at least you're not saying the term "personal plan" is the only facet of the argument in this 7 page thread, so I'm going to give you a serious answer. The curriculum is written in progspeak. Later in the text they give an example of how the personal plan might help them decide to delay when to begin their sexual activity. Implicit in that is they might decide not to delay. They're saying the child can feel free to begin at twelve.
|
Posts: 8738
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 2:26 pm
N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog: fifeboy fifeboy: $1: Can you show me where, in the curriculum, it says that children "should plan on sexual activity that is by statute illegal." $1: “How would thinking about your personal limits and making a personal plan influence decisions you may choose to make about sexual activity?” Well, at least you're not saying the term "personal plan" is the only facet of the argument in this 7 page thread, so I'm going to give you a serious answer. The curriculum is written in progspeak. Later in the text they give an example of how the personal plan might help them decide to delay when to begin their sexual activity. Implicit in that is they might decide not to delay. They're saying the child can feel free to begin at twelve. I thought you were going to give me a serious answer! You say it's implicit that the kids can feel free to begin sexual activity at twelve. I say it's implied that with knowledge, a twelve year old who might have "started" could, with their newfound knowledge, decide to say no! That's what education is about!
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 2:36 pm
See this is why I distrust the Progressive defining of terms. They have problems with language. Disagreeing with you doesn't mean I'm not serious. But, here's some more critique of the curriculum. This time it's from a Muslim school. They flat out say they won't teach the curriculum. They must be right, cause you know...Muslims. Muslims are always right because not all Muslims are the same or something like that. Anyway... $1: You don’t have to be extremely religious or conservative to see how preposterous the public school sex ed curriculum is. Imagine your six year old sitting in the classroom learning about the anatomical names of sexual organs. Or your 8 year old is being taught to believe that homosexual family structure is normal without any regard to what you believe. And what about when your 9 year old boy is taught that it’s okay if he chooses to be a little girl instead and your 9 year old daughter is taught that friendships can change into romantic relationships. This is not exaggerated at all as the curriculum has been revealed and is available on the Ontario Ministry of Education’s page (to save your time and energy, images from the curriculum are inserted below) and it gets even worse for children age 10 and older.
Haadi school can provide your child an environment that is safe and healthy for young minds. Where the staff shares the same morals and values you have at home. Our subject-focused curriculum will make your child excel in English, Science, Math etc. We can still teach children about health and physical education, Internet safety and how to stand up against bullying without sexualizing anything. http://islamicschoolintoronto.ca/haadi- ... urriculum/
Last edited by N_Fiddledog on Thu Mar 05, 2015 2:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Posts: 11362
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 2:41 pm
N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog: sandorski sandorski: Your whole argument seems to centre around the word "Coach". You have attempted to draw one conclusion based upon that word based upon 2 unrelated usages. I find it quite perplexing that anyone could make such an argument and expect anyone else to draw the same conclusion you are drawing.
So again, giving you the opportunity to redeem yourself, are you a troll or easily triggered? You're taking a small bit from a large multi-faceted, well supported argument and doing what prog trolls do when revealed as idiots by such complexity. You're calling troll. You're so ridiculous, you're almost humorous. I am merely commenting on what you have posted. If it is multifaceted, you certainly have not made it so.
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 2:44 pm
sandorski sandorski: N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog: sandorski sandorski: Your whole argument seems to centre around the word "Coach". You have attempted to draw one conclusion based upon that word based upon 2 unrelated usages. I find it quite perplexing that anyone could make such an argument and expect anyone else to draw the same conclusion you are drawing.
So again, giving you the opportunity to redeem yourself, are you a troll or easily triggered? You're taking a small bit from a large multi-faceted, well supported argument and doing what prog trolls do when revealed as idiots by such complexity. You're calling troll. You're so ridiculous, you're almost humorous. I am merely commenting on what you have posted. If it is multifaceted, you certainly have not made it so. You're an idiot. (OMG I was almost down to three words. I hope you're not contagious 3 word Sandra)
|
Posts: 65472
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 2:54 pm
Sandorski's actually improved from when his responses were contained to 'Fail' - a response that was sometimes rather opaque.
@Sandorski - this is me complimenting you for improving your conduct on the forum - not that you care, I just want to be clear that I'm complimenting you.
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 3:01 pm
I know me too. I like that he's up past 3 words. Now if he could just start making sense.
Multiple angles and terms have been discussed here. For him to "What Elephant?" me in suggesting there's only one is idiotic. Then he wants to name call. Well guess what happens?
|
Posts: 8738
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 3:27 pm
N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog: See this is why I distrust the Progressive defining of terms. They have problems with language. Disagreeing with you doesn't mean I'm not serious. But, here's some more critique of the curriculum. This time it's from a Muslim school. They flat out say they won't teach the curriculum. They must be right, cause you know...Muslims. Muslims are always right because not all Muslims are the same or something like that. Anyway... $1: You don’t have to be extremely religious or conservative to see how preposterous the public school sex ed curriculum is. Imagine your six year old sitting in the classroom learning about the anatomical names of sexual organs. Or your 8 year old is being taught to believe that homosexual family structure is normal without any regard to what you believe. And what about when your 9 year old boy is taught that it’s okay if he chooses to be a little girl instead and your 9 year old daughter is taught that friendships can change into romantic relationships. This is not exaggerated at all as the curriculum has been revealed and is available on the Ontario Ministry of Education’s page (to save your time and energy, images from the curriculum are inserted below) and it gets even worse for children age 10 and older.
Haadi school can provide your child an environment that is safe and healthy for young minds. Where the staff shares the same morals and values you have at home. Our subject-focused curriculum will make your child excel in English, Science, Math etc. We can still teach children about health and physical education, Internet safety and how to stand up against bullying without sexualizing anything. http://islamicschoolintoronto.ca/haadi- ... urriculum/Was there something in this post I was supposed to comment on? The serious remark? Your rant on Muslims? The post by Muslims? ?
|
Posts: 5233
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 3:32 pm
martin14 martin14: Unsound Unsound: Haha, Catholics my friend.
Really ? Never had that problem with Catholic girls I knew. Guess I got the really bad ones.  Dunno if I'd call it a problem... 
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 4:01 pm
fifeboy fifeboy: Was there something in this post I was supposed to comment on? Truthfully I don't much care, but if you have to have something... So far we've only heard from you about how you would like your granddaughter to, for example, [create a personal plan to influence decisions they may choose to make as twelve year olds about sexual activity.] But what about the majority of people who are not informed (I would say blinded) by Progressive group-think? Take the Muslim school for example. You back their right to oppose this, right? $1: Imagine your six year old sitting in the classroom learning about the anatomical names of sexual organs. Or your 8 year old is being taught to believe that homosexual family structure is normal without any regard to what you believe. And what about when your 9 year old boy is taught that it’s okay if he chooses to be a little girl instead and your 9 year old daughter is taught that friendships can change into romantic relationships. This is not exaggerated at all as the curriculum has been revealed and it gets even worse for children age 10 and older. http://islamicschoolintoronto.ca/haadi- ... urriculum/[/quote]
|
|
Page 7 of 9
|
[ 126 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests |
|
|