CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
Profile
Posts: 1244
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 7:25 am
 


Such a telling response, Gunnair. Now, have you considered the Status of Women programme and Kairos? As just a couple of examples.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 50938
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 7:33 am
 


eureka eureka:
Such a telling response, Gunnair. Now, have you considered the Status of Women programme and Kairos? As just a couple of examples.

I don't want to be a bitch or something, but what does that have to do with the British PM asking around if they can please change the succession law for Will and Kate's kids?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 42160
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 7:41 am
 


The old coot is nuttier than squirrel shit.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23565
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:15 am
 


Brenda Brenda:
eureka eureka:
Such a telling response, Gunnair. Now, have you considered the Status of Women programme and Kairos? As just a couple of examples.

I don't want to be a bitch or something, but what does that have to do with the British PM asking around if they can please change the succession law for Will and Kate's kids?


Nothing. Next he'll be complaining about the Jets losing streak as yet another example of how evil the Harper Conservatives are.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23565
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:24 am
 


eureka eureka:
Such a telling response, Gunnair. Now, have you considered the Status of Women programme and Kairos? As just a couple of examples.


Examples of what? Harper being a mysogynist?

$1:
mi·sog·y·nis·tic (m-sj-nstk) also mi·sog·y·nous (-sj-ns)
adj.
Of or characterized by a hatred of women.


Stick to claiming to know something about climate science because you apparently have little clue about what a misogynist is if that's what you use for examples.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
Profile
Posts: 1244
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:21 pm
 


Your great respect for the other sex, Gunnair, allows to dismiss those examples.

It has nothing to do with the Monarchy, Brenda. It does have to do with my surprise that Harper could accept female succession.

But then, it is one more political move by Harper is it not since, not long ago, this was his position:

“The successor to the throne [Prince Charles] is a man,” said Mr. Harper. “The next successor to the throne [Prince William] is a man. I don’t think Canadians want to open a debate on the monarchy or constitutional matters at this time. That’s our position, and I just don’t see that as a priority for Canadians right now at all.”

British commentators expressed their disappointment in Harper at the time. They wanted Canada's support.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23565
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:33 pm
 


eureka eureka:
Your great respect for the other sex, Gunnair, allows to dismiss those examples.



It does. I generally give little credence (beyond the obvious humour factor)to the political temper tantrums and partisan playground tirades offered by any idiot of the far left or far right. Any obviously pathetic attempt to equate that Harper is a woman hater simply because he won't throw bags of cash at your pet projects of the week demonstrates the depths of political immaturity you are wallowing in, friend.

Please, call out for a rope if you need one.. or don't. I care not, really.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 42160
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:37 pm
 


nope...he generally calls out for more paint after he's painted himself into a corner, as Dr. Caleb pointed out.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
Profile
Posts: 1244
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:02 pm
 


Just the usual lame responses!


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23565
PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:04 pm
 


eureka eureka:
Just the usual lame responses!


Keep practicing, and you'll eventually work up to a usual lame response. :lol:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15244
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:42 pm
 


My preferred outcome:

------------------------------------------------
From: Buckingham Palace [[email protected]]
To: Stephen Harper [[email protected]]
Sent: September 1, 2011
Subject: FW: FW: FW: FW: Consent to Royal Succession
Marked: Urgent

Steve,

WTF???

-Phil.

---------------------------

From: Buckingham Palace [[email protected]]
To: Stephen Harper [[email protected]]
Sent: September 1, 2011
Subject: FW: FW: FW: FW: Consent to Royal Succession
Marked: Urgent


Hi Stephen,

Any update on this item?

Buckingham Palace

-------------------------------------
From: Buckingham Palace [[email protected]]
To: Stephen Harper [[email protected]]
Sent: FW: FW: FW: Consent to Royal Succession

Hi Stephen,

We presume that you must not have received our prior communictions on this item. Please see below.

Regards,

Buckingham Palance

-------------------------------------
From: Buckingham Palace [[email protected]]
To: Stephen Harper [[email protected]]
Sent: July 1, 2011
Subject: FW: FW: Consent to Royal Succession


Dear Stephen,

We eagerly await your reply to our earlier communications reagridng succession to the Throne of England and Her Realms. Please reply at your earliest convenience.

Kindest Reagards,

Buckingham Palace
-------------------------------------
From: Buckingham Palace [[email protected]]
To: Stephen Harper [[email protected]]
Sent: June 1, 2011
Subject: FW: Consent to Royal Succession


Dearest Stephen,

We have yet to receive a response from you regarding our earlier communications on the subject of succession to the Throne of England and Her Realms. Please advise of your government's intent to support our measure.

Faithfully Yours,

Buckingham Palace


-------------------------------------
From: Buckingham Palace [[email protected]]
To: _Commonwealth countries [Group]
Sent: May 1, 2011
Subject: Consent to Royal Succession
Attachment: Royal_Succession.pdf

Dear Commonwealth Nations,

Please review the attached document regarding our propsed reforms to Succession to the Royal Throne. We trust that you will provide your official response within 30 days. Document passoword follows our usual convention.

With God's Love,

Buckingham Palace


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 42160
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 12:04 am
 


I think there may be a joke hiding in there...not sure...but i think so.


Offline
Newbie
Newbie
Profile
Posts: 1
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 5:53 am
 


Spam


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33691
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 6:03 am
 


lizaC lizaC:
IS QUEEN ELIZABETH JEWISH?
It is hard to believe that official and national figures we honor most of all can be very secretive. But, unfortunately, people are being deceived a lot. The mystery of the Jewish descendents is discussed secretly in the ruling circles. Did you ever question why the wedding of the world of Kate Middleton and Prince William was set on Friday? Was it anyhow connected with sanctity of Saturday that Jewish people observe?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvxkyQAIqN8[video][/video]



Here is the real joke Shep... :)

Listen up chump, we all know Wilie and Kate were married on Friday
because they are secret Muslims.
When Willie becomes King, he will convert all us white folk over to Islam,
then we can get them Joooooooooooooooos real good.


Bombs away !!!!


ROTFL


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15681
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 6:09 am
 


lizaC lizaC:
IS QUEEN ELIZABETH JEWISH?
It is hard to believe that official and national figures we honor most of all can be very secretive. But, unfortunately, people are being deceived a lot. The mystery of the Jewish descendents is discussed secretly in the ruling circles. Did you ever question why the wedding of the world of Kate Middleton and Prince William was set on Friday? Was it anyhow connected with sanctity of Saturday that Jewish people observe?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvxkyQAIqN8[video][/video]


Wow, foiler city.

British royal weddings of stature are held on weekdays so the plebs can attend. They make it a 'bank holiday' so everybody is off.

Those Jews don't half get unexpected hatred. Makes me wanna ditch the RC thing and become a Jew. I'm just not that into religion though.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.